She could not deny that there must be something wrong in a double standard of morality, but where was it? Mr. Ratcliffe seemed to her to be doing good work with as pure means as he had at hand. He ought to be encouraged, not reviled. What was she that she should stand in judgement?
Blogging the Bookshelf
Blogging my bookshelf – one book at a time
-
Recent Comments
-
fred: LOL
- Lisa Hill: LOL ‘gay’ ‘Japanese’ +”boy’ – I had the same phenomenon when I...
- Shelly Grist: Flowers for Algernon was required reading in my high school American literature class. This story, and...
- The Worst of Perth: Whoa, what, you’re back? And with this?
- David: Inverted comma should have ended after “….for his wife”
-
fred: LOL
No Comments so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.